Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley stands by her choice to reject a ballot proposition to repeal the state's 2011 casino legislation. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have actually been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They've had wins and losses across the continuing state, nonetheless they've always made their case. Now, they're hoping that the highest court in Massachusetts will give them one last chance to put the problem before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments week that is last the concern of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up on the statewide ballot in November. The move would really produce a referendum on whether casinos could be built one which could disrupt the procedure also if it had been to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Would Be Violated By Repeal
That disruption had been one of the main arguments made by lawyers for hawaii, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, whom rejected the petition it was unconstitutional because she felt. According to Coakley, such a repeal would damage the 'implied agreements' between casino license applicants and the continuing state gambling payment. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally taken away without any compensation for the casino companies.
Coakley made remarks at a breakfast forum in